A facilitator designs and guides the way your team works together so you can share relevant information, think clearly and reach sound decisions, while staying neutral on the content and outcome.

A facilitated workshop is a structured process that sequences contributions and makes thinking visible so everyone reasons from the same information. Unlike typical meetings, participants often ‘work alone, together’ and sessions end with a clear decision or next steps.

The facilitator runs the process (purpose, agenda, ground rules, time) and helps the group reason openly, while your leader/Decider owns the content and makes the final call when needed.

It’s most useful when you need alignment, clear decisions, problem framing or prioritisation on real work (e.g., product launch trade‑offs, cross‑department collaboration), and it works for both problems and opportunities.

Yes — the approach is used successfully across cultures; we use plain language, protect face, and rely on structured, inclusive methods rather than confrontation. You might want to find a facilitator that speaks your language though.

The people who will do the work, those with key knowledge, and those who can make or ratify decisions, with a clearly named primary client and Decider identified upfront.

We co‑design the goal and agenda, then use simple tools like silent idea generation, clustering and structured voting to move from ideas to decisions efficiently.

Yes — common formats include problem‑framing, prioritisation, product or marketing strategy and kick‑offs, often adapted from proven structures like LDJ, Design Sprints or Strategy Sprints. Contact us for detail.

We clarify roles at the start: facilitator (process), participants (content and evidence), and Decider (final call), with structured input (e.g., voting) before any decision is made

We agree ground rules, ask clear, respectful questions that focus on interests and reasoning, and use time‑boxed steps to keep momentum and reduce unhelpful debate.

We build in silent writing, short share‑outs and structured voting so quieter voices contribute and ideas are judged on merit, not airtime or seniority.

Agree the objective, who should attend, decision rights, time and place; share any relevant data or constraints so we can tailor the process to your reality.

Before: brief discovery to understand your goals and context, then jointly design purpose and process.

After: a concise pack of decisions, priorities and next actions, plus a quick evaluation to see what to improve.

It depends on your objectives; we propose a right‑sized agenda and time‑boxes, from a single decision workshop to a short series if the scope is bigger.

We agree simple success criteria up front (e.g., decisions made, priorities set, actions owned), gather quick feedback at the end and, if useful, schedule a short follow‑up to check progress.